PhatHack
May 30, 2012, 09:49:49 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Registration only by approval.  You probably want to send one of the admins an email asking them to approve you if you just created an account.
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Interesting files on PHTSYS root...  (Read 3747 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
para
Senior Member
Veteran.
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 181



WWW
« Reply #20 on: March 16, 2005, 06:50:31 pm »

Quote
I noticed that, it isnt signed. "RoyalLin.ux" is the same size as the "Linux" file so im wondering if it was just a renaming job and those files are just there to be backward compatible.


Looks like that! Their contents are just slightly different. Maybe differing in a minor revision only...

Bye
Logged

Firefox
Needs to get outside.
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 124


Kenwood 710 Keg 80GB ;-)


« Reply #21 on: March 16, 2005, 07:23:19 pm »

Quote
What about "phat" (not the daemon)?

I havn't read anything about it here yet... "51" obviously means PB or DMS but it could also be the "startprog" Roll Eyes I'd like to know more about "testmode" and "update". As the latter uses some decryption there's possibly some private key in there. Furthermore it seems to be an unsigned file to be played with Cool

Just in case, Para

(Oops, just saw Firefox mentioned it already)


I take 51 to mean the 8051 microcontroller.

google search for phatnoise and 8051 gives these results...
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=phatnoise%208051&hl=en&lr=&sa=N&tab=gw

the raisonance link gives some clues about the software and compilers used by danb in 2002 at least...

http://www.raisonance.com/Forum/phorum-3.3.2b2/read.php?f=1&i=2032&t=2032

« Last Edit: March 16, 2005, 07:29:27 pm by Firefox » Logged
AndyMan
Getting the hang of things.
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 75



« Reply #22 on: March 16, 2005, 08:41:39 pm »

Damned, almost had a heart attack there  Sad  the 8051 is definitely my favorite microcontroller (after the 8048 of course) but it seems as  though the 8051 is only being used to drive the head-unit  Huh
Logged
para
Senior Member
Veteran.
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 181



WWW
« Reply #23 on: March 16, 2005, 08:42:22 pm »

Thanks, sound reasonable...

Check this: might come in handy:
http://www.microcontroller.com/embedded/references/faqs/8051-microcontroller-faq.htm
Logged

A543
Senior Member
Veteran.
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 214



« Reply #24 on: March 17, 2005, 03:17:20 am »

Quote
"RoyalLin.ux" is the same size as the "Linux" file so im wondering if it was just a renaming job and those files are just there to be backward compatible.


Maybe if RoyalLin.ux doesn't check sig files because it's just used during bootup/keycheck, then copying RoyalLin.ux to Linux might be a way around the sig checking on the current versions, it might not run 100% normally depending on what the small differences are, but it might allow us to get as far as messing with hdparm or rc.sh, just to get some information.

So if the "51" is a controller for the headunit, and
the ARM controller is the main one, then is there yet another one for the initial bootup/keycheck/firmware update routines?
Logged
A543
Senior Member
Veteran.
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 214



« Reply #25 on: March 17, 2005, 03:34:58 am »

Here's a link that might have some useful info:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2002-April/008686.html

Also google for "Cryptnotic", or crypt@phatnoise.com, the user name of one of Phatnoises coders.  He's asked some coding questions on some boards here and there, but nothing seemed useful to me except the link above.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2011, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.023 seconds with 15 queries.